Through my radio show La Rocker, Magazine Midnight, I had the opportunity, in most cases, also the pleasure of speaking with many people who are directly or indirectly related to the world of literature and therefore toward reading. I have attended numerous press conferences, I've always been interested in theatrical presentations, because I believe in the literary world is the method of creative expression, where a guiding principle takes own life and creates a magic that transports us to a world where stories are emerging at random according to the director, the interpretation of the actors, and now through the continuous updates that are made by great authors. Thus we have, for example: "Tartuffe" by Moliere, and then in smaller print: version of … / "Filomena Marturano" by Eduardo De Filippo, and below: version … / Sometimes, even, are used name of work, assuming that everyone knows and plus versions, is given as author. It is not my intention to question the way these people write what others created versioned, sometimes based on many penalties, and few economic benefits, or being told not to Cervantes.
How had his life changed with just one part of the money to be endorsed who take the rights of its versions. The justification that is common on the part of those responsible, is argurmentar: that times change, now can not represent what is written in certain ways, that in the background the author makes it propaganda … year!, no creator wants his works are handled. Can you imagine that someone wanted to modernize the costumes for the "Meninas" by Velazquez? … Covering the bodies of "The Kiss" by Rodin … remove the verses rhyme Gustavo Adolfo Becquer …
When an author goes into the public domain, should be better protected by laws, institutions and academies of languages; to safeguard, not only the title and "argument", but for generations to come see for themselves exactly how to write a particular author.